1/2/2024 0 Comments Autocrypt linux debian![]() ![]() You go to, download the browser, and use it to browse the Web. But if you want to play around with it, it’s really not that hard. Tor is the exception to this rule because it’s free and designed to reduce tracking, right? That’s a different perspective than a network service that you may or may not decide to use. Brand and market it, and then maybe I’m paying you to harvest my data.Īnother consideration: What privacy controls do we have on existing VPN services we might buy? They should be subject to the same constraints that we would like to put on the ISPs, because they are in the position to see all of the different stuff that we do online. And you could monitor everybody’s traffic just by monitoring the VPNs, instead of all the different on-ramps.Īnd if you had a big budget and wanted to do a lot of monitoring, you could even set up your own VPN and sell access. If you can’t afford a VPN, most of your connections are going out in the clear, which means that your network provider has an opportunity to surveil you and build profiles about you.īut if everyone gets a VPN, all network traffic would get concentrated at a few VPN companies instead of at the various Internet service providers. Which ostensibly privacy-preserving technologies are people are buying that might actually be compromising them? Virtual private networks ? So there’s not enough of a market, in some sense, for privacy-preserving technologies. (And some of them actually are invasive.) And a lot of people don’t even actively consider privacy when making purchasing decisions. Some services people buy are intended to help keep you off others’ radar. This is not just a digital-divide thing it’s a general situation where people buy privacy for themselves. Someone who can afford a home has more privacy than someone who can’t afford a home. You see that already, in many situations. ![]() My biggest fear is that we’re going to accept, as a society, that privacy is a luxury. Q: There seems to be a growing digital divide over privacy technology. What follows is an edited transcript of our conversation. Photo courtesy ACLU.Īfter Gillmor’s presentation, he and I spoke at length about three of today’s biggest challenges to consumer privacy: rising costs, responsibilities of private companies to their users, and struggles to make email more safe and private. Gillmor’s talk was more of a pitch about what a CDN can do than what Fastly is actually doing. Gillmor explained how a content delivery network, or CDN, could combine new Internet traffic analysis countermeasures and Domain Name System obfuscation to help prevent spies from snooping on consumers’ Internet activities. The importance of metadata to surveillance was underscored by former National Security Agency Director Michael Hayden in 2014, when he declared, “We kill people based on metadata.” “The adversaries who are doing network monitoring tend to focus on metadata, not on content,” he told the crowd of engineers about the essential tracking data created when we write emails, watch cat videos online, or text emojis. He also believes that the future of consumer privacy depends on technology providers taking bolder steps to protect their users.Īt a recent conference held here by the content delivery network company Fastly, Gillmor spent 20 minutes explaining a set of technology proposals that a modern Web host like Fastly can undertake to defend privacy-without burying itself in costly changes. ![]() SAN FRANCISCO-Can something as mundane as modern Web hosting be used to increase consumer privacy? Daniel Kahn Gillmor, a senior staff technologist at the ACLU’s Project on Speech, Privacy, and Technology, thinks so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |